Minorities Favor Government Using Social Media

Aug 19

I recently came across a study by the Pew Internet and American Life Project, which discusses how Americans use government Web sites, and how social media can be integrated into the government’s online presence. The study is over a year old, but given that in the past year alone, social media has sparked social, cultural, and in particular, political revolutions, the findings are still timely. According to this study (which is loaded with information), the government’s role in the online space, and in particular, the social media space, is sure to resonate with its constituents, and especially its minorities.

One finding which particularly struck me was the conclusion that minorities are equally likely to get government information using digital platforms and furthermore, that African Americans and Latinos, compared to whites, are more likely to express positive attitudes towards  government engagement in social media.  Check out this video by study author Aaron Smith, Research Specialist at the Pew Internet and American Life Project, who briefly explains.

While the study does note that the average government Web site user is affluent, highly educated and White, minorities do still use the internet and social media to obtain government information. In fact, minority Americans were more likely than Whites to believe that government social media outreach makes the government agencies and officials more accessible.

For social marketers who search for the best ways to reach their audiences, and for those of us who work on government campaigns, we can use studies like this to reassure, and encourage, our clients that social media is a viable and valuable option to reach our minority audiences.

The findings are not too surprising, given recent studies that mention that the digital divide is now decreasing, and that more people are now able to get online.  But, what’s interesting is the extent to which we embrace social media, so much so, that we’re encouraging our government to collaborate with us in this way. And, according to the report, Americans don’t believe the government is wasting money by using social media. (Surprising, I know).

So, what are some ways that the government can strike a chord with minorities? Well, for starters, begin blogging, friending, and tweeting.

Survey Recognizes Social Marketing as Critical Tool in Driving Social Change

Aug 17

Findings were released yesterday from a survey conducted by Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide, in collaboration with The Conference People, prior to the 2nd World Non-Profit and Social Marketing Conference. The survey was conducted to examine trends and issues of social marketing, as well as priorities for the future.

More than 600 marketers, communications experts, and researchers from 40 countries convened at the Conference in Dublin, Ireland, on April 11-12, 2011. The survey, conducted among Conference participants and invitees—including representatives of leading corporations, civic organizations, academic institutions, governmental entities, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)—found that 84% of respondents report that they believe that social marketing is at a critical turning point in driving social change.

The key findings showcase that the application of marketing and communications to support personal behavior and social change is poised to become an increasingly important tool for addressing global health and social issues.

Here are some highlights:

When asked to identify the areas in which social marketing has most advanced societal progress, respondents named:

Looking ahead, respondents identified areas in which they felt that social marketing was most needed to drive future awareness and behavior change. Obesity, chronic illness, and environmental stewardship top the list of emerging priorities.

Read the rest of this entry »

Google+ for Business: An Innovative Tool for Social Marketers

Aug 04

On June 28, 2011, Google launched its social networking answer to Facebook, Google+. Within the first 2 weeks, this invitation only network amassed 10 million users. Now, a little over a month later, the site has 25 million users and that number continues to grow exponentially.

Like Facebook, Google+ is a platform for consumers to share personalized information with people in their social circles. Eventually, Google+ will offer its users complete integration with all Google products. Products like Google Places, Google Maps and Picasa will seamlessly link into users’ streams and fan out to their networks. First, let’s define the Google+ lingo.

Streams: The primary way to communicate information on Google+. Streams are status updates that can be shared with friends across circles.
Circles: An organizational tool that separates those in your social network into easy to identify groups. For a business, circles can separate fans by how frequently they post/comment, their primary interests or their purchasing behavior.
Hangouts: A video chat feature that allows for two person video conversations, or accommodates a video conference for up to 10 users. Within the next few months, this feature will also include hearing-impaired capabilities.
Sparks: A stream of search-engine results based off of users’ interests. Sparks is an opportunity to have Google+ search and aggregate videos, pictures, and articles based on the user’s interest.

Google+ for business rolls out later this year. Already, over 10,000 businesses have petitioned Google for a business account. In addition to organizations like Ford Motor Company, Sesame Street, and Mashable, the roster of businesses eager to try Google+ includes law firms, charities, and non-profits. The communication possibilities for social marketers are almost limitless. Read the rest of this entry »

Crowdsourcing for Government: Turning Crowds into Communities

Jul 28

Over the past week, I helped world renowned scientists from Carnegie Mellon University discover new ways to fold RNA molecules, adding to their understanding of RNA’s biological activity and contributing to the storehouse of knowledge that may eventually shed light on the origins of life. What did you do?

I did this playing an online video game (in my spare time) called EteRNA, which I learned about at Crowdsourcing: The Art and Science of Open Innovation – an event held at the NIH last week. The video game harnesses the wisdom and enthusiasm of amateur biologists by asking them to compete against each other to create the best synthetic RNA molecule designs. Players are rewarded with increased rankings and bragging rights. Top designs are chosen weekly and the molecules are actually synthesized by scientists at Stanford and scored based on their ability to function properly in real life environments. The EteRNA community’s collective effort could have significant medical and scientific applications.

According to research lead Dr. Adrien Treuille, the success of the game was built largely upon the enthusiasm and connectedness of the community of gamers, not just their collective brainpower.  They chat, talk trash, share ideas and best practices on forums, contribute to the visibility of the University and its RNA research, and are “part of the RNA revolution”. Without the ongoing engagement of the community, Treuille’s research would not be as successful (he acknowledged this last year by crediting his players as a contributing author in a peer-reviewed article in Nature). Read the rest of this entry »

The Intersection of Cause Involvement and Behavior Change

Jul 16

When designing interventions for behavior change, the first things that usually come to mind are how to remove the barriers to action, how to increase self-efficacy, or even if the external conditions are favorable for the adoption of the desired behavior. Not often do we consider that involvement in causes can actually trigger individual behavior changes.

However, new findings from the Dynamics of Cause Engagement study revealed that more than half of Americans say they have changed their behavior because of their involvement in a cause.

Voting is the number one behavior change triggered by cause involvement across all ages, ethnicities and genders. Environmentally conscious actions (e.g., changing recycling habits, becoming more energy efficient) are also near the top of the list, while health-related behaviors (e.g., visiting a medical professional, requesting a specific medical test) fall lower.

Our study also found interesting differences by ethnicity and gender when it comes to cause-driven behavior change. While Caucasians are more likely to report changes in environmentally conscious behavior, African Americans are more likely to have visited a doctor or medical professional as a result of their involvement in a cause. Women are significantly more likely than men to say they have changed their behavior due to cause involvement (55% vs. 48%), including environmentally conscious actions and health-related behaviors.

These results were presented for the first time at the 21st Annual Social Marketing in Public Health Conference.

During the presentation, we suggested some strategies to motive behavior change through cause involvement. We also shared some real-life examples of how practitioners are applying these strategies.

Here is a sneak preview of the strategies:

1. Provide multiple touch points for support expression

2. Motivate story sharing

3. Reinforce a sense of community

4. Empower supporters

5. Foster an emotional connection

To download the full presentation click here.

Surprised by the findings?  Please share your thoughts.

For more information on the study, click here and stay tuned for the upcoming release of the final report.

Big Words / Little Understanding – Scientists need to learn the art of public speaking

Jul 01

I love words and growing up I loved learning and using new words – strange and different words that most people didn’t know and certainly didn’t use. It helped that I had four older brothers all attending college while I was still in grammar and middle school. Using big words – 50 cent words as neighbors would call them – impressed and made me look smart. But when honing my skills as a journalist I realized that if the goal was reaching and affecting people, big words were more often a barrier than a conduit (especially in broadcast news).

By and large, most scientists are still very much in love with the words of their profession. And why shouldn’t they be? They spent a lot of time, money and energy learning those words – the ones that precisely express what they are trying to say. Unfortunately, the rest of the public have no idea what they’re saying and therein lies the rub.

College president Barry Glassner recently wrote in USA Today that while the public does have a science literacy problem, scientists need to be more “publicly literate.” He ticks off a list of things that science has failed to communicate very well. First on that list is global warming. Sharon Begley has also written about this in Newsweek and sums it up in one declarative sentence, “scientists are lousy communicators.”

After having spent a couple of decades wrangling soundbites from some of the world’s most distinguished scientists, I now spend much of my time helping scientists speak more simply before they get in front of an audience.

Dr. Francis Collins, head of the National Institutes of Health, didn’t need much help from me when I first interviewed him for CNN more than 15 years ago and he didn’t need much help from me when I helped him put together this recent video on the NIH’s Strategic Plan on Obesity.

He uses common phrases such as “short list” and “wagging fingers at people.” He uses a different intonation when he paraphrases the critics who say, “well, you know, it’s just because people eat too much and don’t get enough exercise.” He’s not afraid to admit that clinical trial results have to be tested in the “real world” and to use every day phrases such as “heart attacks” rather than the jargon “cardiac events.” I like him because he describes things as “truly frightening!”

Having Dr. Collins at the head of NIH shows scientists everywhere the value of learning how to communication effectively – using less big words that will ultimately promote, not compromise, good science to the public.

What Drives Human Behavior…And How Can We Harness That?

Jun 30

The 100 plus attendees engaged in spirited discussion with Piyush Tantia, one of the foremost experts in behavioral economics, attests to the overwhelming success of Ogilvy Washington’s What Drives Human Behavior Exchange. Mr. Tantia translated academic, often cerebral theories on behavioral economics into a set of application-driven insights easily grasped by the PR, government, and media professionals gathered on Wednesday morning. His hour long presentation was interactive and thought provoking, challenging the audience to question long held ‘givens’ and form new reality based insights.

Traditional View: All humans are rational.

Really…

The assembled crowd laughed and nodded in agreement because all could recall a time when they had made the less rationale choice. Tantia pointed to 4 reasons why we sometimes behave ‘irrationally’. Read the rest of this entry »

Ogilvy Washington Takes on CSR Initiative Offering Training to Local Nonprofits

Jun 30

Today, Ogilvy Washington will launch OgilvyConnect, a program to provide communications training to community-based nonprofits serving the National Capital region. Led by rising leaders at Ogilvy Washington, the program’s curriculum will offer communications knowledge, tools, and resources to help these organizations better fulfill their missions.  

Inspired to give back to the DC community, Ogilvy Washington believes that the program will help unite Washington, divided by disparate proportions of wealth and resources.

La Clínica del Pueblo, which provides health services to the DC Latino population regardless of ability to pay, is one of the 21 groups selected to participate in the program. Looking for counsel on how to engage individuals and businesses who can impact their success, Viviana Knowles, Chief Development Officer for the organization, says, “We are thrilled to be part of this innovative program and look forward to implementing what we learn into our communications planning.”

Ogilvy invited select groups to apply earlier this year, and received an overwhelming response. After careful consideration, 21 nonprofit groups were been selected to attend OgilvyConnect’s 2011 inaugural program, including groups that focus on youth engagement, women’s services, hunger, environmental protection, and minority empowerment.

Based upon research conducted with membership and grantee organizations that serve these nonprofit groups as well as others—Washington Area Women’s Foundation, Venture Philanthropy Partners, and Nonprofit Roundtable—the founders of OgilvyConnect have developed a curriculum that will be delivered in four sessions annually.  It will guide groups through key steps in building successful communications programs. The program will feature presentations from experts in and outside the office and will provide an opportunity for nonprofits to learn from the day-to-day work of Ogilvy.

“Since opening our doors 30 years ago, Ogilvy Washington has done pro bono work for local nonprofits. However, we’ve never had a program that trains nonprofit leaders in communications for sustained success,” said Robert Mathias, president of Ogilvy Washington.    “OgilvyConnect allows the local community-based nonprofit groups participating to take what they learn here and apply it for years to come.”

Ogilvy to Host Harvard Behavioral Economics Expert on June 29 to Discuss What Drives Human Behavior

Jun 23

When you’re facing a decision, does the way in which a product is positioned or a question is phrased influence your answer? Proponents of behavioral economics would say yes, resoundingly.

Take this example from a study that examined the rate at which people opted to donate their organs in different countries. In some countries the rate was more than 90 percent, while in other countries it was around 20 percent or less, and there was no in between. Why? Turns out it wasn’t a cultural difference (countries thought to be culturally similar showed widely different behavior), but instead the way the question was worded on the registration form. In countries with high organ donation rates, people are opted in by default and must check a box to opt out. In countries with low rates, people must check a box to donate their organs. Some would say the decision was practically made for the respondents based on how it was positioned.

This is just one example from the field of behavioral economics, which has earned praise and criticism alike. Supporters tout an insightful new way to analyze and predict consumer decisions based on how people really behave; critics say it’s simply a repackaging of consumer behavior theory. Nonetheless, behavioral economics blends psychology and economics to ask questions important for marketing, policy development, and other efforts: why do people so often make decisions that run counter to their own best interests? How do emotions and social forces influence those choices? How do individual decisions ultimately affect the marketplace and society? Most important, behavioral economics offers creative ways to apply these behavioral insights in the hopes of developing more beneficial programs and outcomes.

Join us next Wednesday, June 29 to hear from guest speaker Piyush Tantia, the Executive Director of Ideas42, a non-profit behavioral economics R&D lab housed at Harvard University. As a leader of domestic and international financial design projects, Piyush works closely with leading academics from Harvard, MIT, and Princeton to apply cutting-edge behavioral economics research to improve the design and delivery of financial products with the goal of maximizing social impact. Since early 2009, Piyush has been leading a series of projects applying behavioral insights to foreclosure mitigation.

Click here to RSVP for this event. If you can’t join us on June 29, post your questions as comments here, and we’ll share them with Piyush on Wednesday.

Cartoon from “Behavioral Economics, Strategy and Our Hidden Side” blog

The National Prevention Strategy: A Piece of the Recovery Pie?

Jun 17

We, as Americans, find ourselves living in a time of astounding debt– $14.3 trillion to be exact. Many Americans are worried about their own financial future and freedom as well as the fiscal outlook of our country. As the Administration scrambles to find a solution, parties are further divided over the ‘best’ way to help our country absolve its debt and restore the American dream.

I was struck yesterday by the words of Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) during remarks he gave at the unveiling of the first ever National Prevention Strategy by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). As he talked candidly about transforming our current “sick care system” (where we invest in health only after diagnosed with serious or chronic illness) to a health care system (focused on prevention) he quoted figures illuminating just how backwards our investments in health care have been. Each year, the U.S. spends more than $2 trillion dollars on health care, but we only invest 4 cents (per every dollar spent on health care) on prevention. He continued that every dollar invested in prevention could save $6 dollars in health care costs. Now that’s a substantial ROI.

Against the backdrop of the current financial crisis, could an investment in prevention be part of our debt solution? A piece of the recovery pie. In light of these figures and the alarming rate of preventable chronic disease, Surgeon General Regina Benjamin outlined HHS’s four pronged approach for investing in prevention and creating a healthier nation. My colleague Maria James details the national plan in her post, but in my opinion, it’s a sound investment of public resources – creating healthier communities, preventing chronic and life-limiting disease, and reducing the fiscal burden of our current health care system on the economy.

As our policymakers look for new, innovative strategies to help our country crawl out of this seemingly black hole of debt, Senator Harkin, his left-wing colleagues, and health economists, who have been preaching prevention for years, may be on to something. I’m anxious to see how HHS and its peer agencies rollout this plan at the community level, and if its local programs do, over time, solicit healthy behavior changes and generate cost-savings at the national level. This unprecedented, holistic approach to improving the nation’s health is a step in the right direction for not only our waistlines, but potentially our wallets as well.